we got no samples for developing from DM
So wan cannot support this model.

Dream Multimedia GmbH has given a DM92xHD to the HDFREAKS Team for developing a new Image long time ago, so the answer of the user Googgi is not true.
Let's see how things are going in the future.

I have no info about that.

DM should contact directly the person who got it, to clear what promises are made.

@ljazzo1
May I ask where from you got this information?
I bought mine myself. And it’s a pity, that Dream Property does not support the oe-alliance Teams for handling the FBC-Tuners. Therefore it doesn’t make sense to create
any image for the box. My opinion.

@itz4mie

The Box was delivered to Henry long time ago and the information are from Dream Multimedia directly (Leo). I don't want to open an useless discussion here but i also don't like to read wrong information that an image is not going to be developed because there is no Box.

I assume that Googgi is not well informed or no nobody told him that HDFREAKS already have a DM92x Bix..this is what i got after some emails with him

" Therefore it doesn’t make sense to create "
..well .. then there is no need that HDFREAKS get a BOX from Dream Multimedia. I think people can understand amd see what is true or not

I don't care if HDFREAKS is going to develop an Image for DM92X .. and i don't know who got this new Box

You know and I know, that the FBC-Tuner also have to work well in an Image. And as long as DP doesn‘t support all Teams that the Tuner works, like it does in DreamOS-Images, the user has no choice to use any other image.

Edit: You know, that meanwhile DM is listed in „Hersteller ohne Support“ at oATV.

Thats true.



As i told you several times before: please contact henry directly.

The public discussion with others is useless.
Nobody here knows what Leo and Henry has agreed.

@Googgi

i did !! form my personal view this topic now is closed for me. I don't have doubt about Googgi reports but i feel weird that i have first to report something ..do some research to know the truth. Pity we have to go this way

"Nobody here knows what Leo and Henry has agreed."
then you should not write " we got no samples for developing from DM, So wan cannot support this model. "

!!! feel free to close this topic !!!

I wrote this in January!!!

Its better to close now...

Hello,

@ljazzo1 I don't know who you are and where you've got your information from. BUT
Fact is Googgi is neither lying nor is he incorrect!
I did not got any dm920 sample.

Topic done now..